Working Space in front of Equipment 110.26(A)

  • Post author:
  • Post category:News
  • Post comments:0 Comments

This weeks post comes from a couple of statements that needed to be clarified.  I was told that the working space in front of a service disconnect had to be measured from the middle of the disconnect.  That is not how the measurement is taken please review the slide below for accuracy in measuring the safe working space in front of equipment. If you have questions please email me at jleccemail@hotmail.com

WORKING SPACE

We are in the last week of October and if you are an ER contractor and have the required 5 years you can grandfather your license into an EC.

After 11/1/2015 they are not grandfathering in ERs to ECs.  They may start again in the future by why wait.

 

Till next week work safe

 

Jake

Continue ReadingWorking Space in front of Equipment 110.26(A)

2014 NEC

  • Post author:
  • Post category:News
  • Post comments:0 Comments

 

Although I stated that I would go into the 2014 NEC changes, I feel it would be more productive to address common problems found out in the field.  This past week I had two different buildings that where undergoing services changes that had a common problem when I went to inspect.  Both buildings had multiple services installed on them, but each service had a separate Grounding Electrodes.  When I asked the contractors to fix it they had told they had never had to do this before.  Each building had a 120/208 volt  Y three phase service and a 277/480 volt Y three phase service installed next to each other both sporting two brand new Grounding Electrodes.  I ask them to bond them together and was questioned as to what Code section they had violated. The following is the section from the NEC 2011.

 

250.58b

 

Till next week, be safe.

Continue Reading2014 NEC

Revisit to 110.24(A), and (B)

  • Post author:
  • Post category:News
  • Post comments:0 Comments

This past week I had three different contractors who were surprised when I asked them about the LABEL they were supposed to install on the Service Equipment per this section.  So I felt this needed to be addressed again to help you pass your inspections.  This section is pretty plain and states “Service equipment installed in other than a dwelling unit shall be field marked with the maximum available fault current”.  The field markings shall include the DATE the calculation was performed and that the LABEL shall be of sufficient durability to withstand the environment involved.  A sharpie is not going to cut it because although it says permanent it is not.  Some form of a label shall be made to withstand the sun and salt environment we have down here in South Florida.

So after my inspections this week, I have three jobs all waiting for labels to be placed on the service equipment before I can final out their permits.  It was noted on the plans for these jobs that I was expecting this to be done because it is a NEW code change and I am required by the Code to enforce these new requirements. 

In Lake Worth it will not be a problem to get the Fault Current of the transformer because I have them and can supply them with the plan review or  at the inspection.  All I need is the size,  and secondary voltage of the transformer to be able to supply this information.  The information I give out is the FAULT CURRENT at the terminals of the transformer and not at the service equipment. 

There are several fault current calculators out there on the WEB to be found for free as an ap or download that will help you to calculate the AIC at the service equipment. 

So when the inspectors looks for the LABEL it should already be there.

 

Till next week be safe

 

Jake

Continue ReadingRevisit to 110.24(A), and (B)

NEW GFCI PROTECTION REUIREMENT FOR UL Self Testing GFCI protection

  • Post author:
  • Post category:News
  • Post comments:0 Comments

This is a new requirement for the manufacturing of GFCI breakers and receptacles.  UL has upped the bar for these devices requiring them to self test.  If one of these devices detect a leakage of current they trip and have to be hand reset.  The tripping of one of these devices may signal a wiring problem in your home. So just resetting may not solve the problem.  Below are a few links to these new products, one of these links is for a receptacle that will not turn on if wired improperly.  The UL requirement for these devices went into effect in June of this year (2015).  The inventory of old type GFCI protection will be allowed to be sold but all new devices will be manufactured using the new standard.  If you can’t get the links below to work just put “self test GFCI products” in your search bar.

http://www.nema.org/news/Pages/NEMA-and-UL-Announce-Revisions-to-UL-943-GFCI-Standard.aspx

http://www.leviton.com/OA_HTML/ibeCCtpSctDspRte.jsp?section=33474&minisite=10021

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-1fWxB5WtA

http://www.geindustrial.com/products/circuit-breakers/ground-fault-circuit-interrupter-self-test-gfci

 

Till next week be safe out there.

Jake

Continue ReadingNEW GFCI PROTECTION REUIREMENT FOR UL Self Testing GFCI protection

This is not a CODE change, but a clarification. 314.21 REPAIRING THE SURFACES, 110.12 MECHANICAL EXECUTION OF WORK.

  • Post author:
  • Post category:News
  • Post comments:0 Comments

 

The following pictures represent what some  GC’s feel is Ok for your final electrical inspection.  The code requires that the openings in the finish around switches and receptacles be no more than 1/8” the cover plate will definitely cover this amount.   It has become the job of the inspector to make sure that these minor defects are completed.  The pictures are from a job that the GC told me that they would take care of them, and they were not.  Although some of the pictures are fuzzy and out of focus you should be able to get the idea.  This installation also violates article 110.12 for Mechanical execution of work.  Installed in a neat and workmanlike manner.  Please show this to your GC’s and remind them that these need to be done for and electrical final. If not, you fail, and you have to call for a re-inspection and possibly pay a fee which will lead to a delay in job progress.

314.21a

 

314.21b

 

 314.21c

Till next week be safe work smart

Continue ReadingThis is not a CODE change, but a clarification. 314.21 REPAIRING THE SURFACES, 110.12 MECHANICAL EXECUTION OF WORK.

New AFCI/GFCI Breakers

  • Post author:
  • Post category:News
  • Post comments:0 Comments

This weeks information will introduce you to new types of circuit breakers.  Most manufacturers have come up with the combination AFCI (Arc Fault) and GFCI (Ground Fault) breaker to keep up with the changing technology in the NEC.  Although here in Florida we have not adopted the 2014 NEC there are specific applications for branch circuitry that will require both Arc Fault and Ground Fault protection on the same circuit. 

When out in the field doing inspections and  I mention that these products are available, some are surprised that these types of devices even exist , “a circuit breaker that has both GFCI and AFCI protection.”  Wow!    

Use the two links below to get more information about these new and innovative products.

 

http://www.schneider-electric.us/en/product-range/62274-qo-dual-function-circuit-breakers/?parent-category-id=50300&parent-subcategory-id=50310

 

http://w3.usa.siemens.com/powerdistribution/us/en/product-portfolio/circuit-breakers/residential-circuit-breakers/pages/dual-function.aspx?stc=usem100037&sp_source=usem100037&s_kwcid=AL!464!3!75015126419!p!!g!!gfci%20protection&ef_id=VE5iKAAAAe1w7URX:20150816125504:s

 

AFCI GFCI BRKRS a

Till next week work safe and be safe.

 

Jake

Continue ReadingNew AFCI/GFCI Breakers

Track Lighting loads 220.43(B) EXP.

This weeks Code change is based on load calculations from article 220.   220.43(B) requires that a load of 150 va be included for each 2’ of track lighting.  This can add up to be a substantial load when not necessarily needed.  There is an exception to this section that will allow us to include the loads for our calculation to be based on a device that can limit the current to the track.  This device has a current limiting feature that will as it states “limit the current” whether it is 10’ long or 100’ long section of track.

Click on the link or cut and paste it to see the brochure for a couple of manufacturers track limiters.  The ones that I have seen out in the field have been from 1 ampere thru 13 amperes.  So using these devices will help reduce the loads calculated for track lighting loads.  This may not seem like a major factor but if you are sizing the lighting load for a furniture store or an art gallery these limiters will help in calculating the service load.  Another type of limiter that I have seen is a panel that has these limiters built into to it using 1 to 13 amperes as circuit limits.

 

 http://www.cooperindustries.com/content/dam/public/lighting/resources/library/literature/Halo/CurrentLimiterBrochure.pdf

http://www.junolightinggroup.com/literature/Subpanel_Brochure.pdf

 

 

TL 220.43(B) EXP.  

Till next week work safe be safe

Jake

Continue ReadingTrack Lighting loads 220.43(B) EXP.