310.15(B)(7) 120/240-Volt, Single-Phase Dwelling Services and Feeders.

I keep getting calls from contractors that tell me that this town or that county no longer allows them to use 2/0 Cu. for a 200a dwelling service or feeder.  This section changed in the 2014 Code but the only thing that changed is they took out the Table and made it into a calculation using 83%.  This 83% rule has seemed to throw off a lot of people in our trade (plan reviewers, inspectors, and contractors).  Just so you know the old table from 2011 Code will still work nothing has changed.  It is not just the 2/0s its all the conductor we use to use in the old Table (see the Table below) they all still work for serving the loads that are shown to serve in the old Table.  They work for both feeders and services.

EXAMPLE:

A 2/0 conductor in the 75 degree column in 310.15(B)(16) is good for 175 amperes

A 200 ampere service rating multiplied by 83% equals a 166 amperes.

So as you can see a 2/0 will be large enough to serve 166 ampere service rating.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

As long as your load calculation does not exceed 200 amperes the “CODE” allows you to exceed the rating of the 2/0 conductors ampacity, by applying the 83% rule in 310.15(B)(7)(1)(2).

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      

See #1 and #2 below to see what the conductors ampacity is based on “SERVICE RATING” and FEEDER RATING”

310.15(B)(7)

(1) For a service rated 100 through 400 A, the service conductors supplying the entire load associated with a one-family dwelling, or the service conductors supplying the entire load associated with an individual dwelling unit in a two-family or multifamily dwelling, shall be permitted to have an ampacity not less than 83 percent of the service rating.

(2) For a feeder rated 100 through 400 A, the feeder conductors supplying the entire load associated with a one-family dwelling, or the feeder conductors supplying the entire load associated with an individual dwelling, unit in a two-family or multifamily dwelling, shall be permitted to have an ampacity not less than 83 percent of the feeder rating.

3/0 is not needed for a dwelling service rated 200 amperes unless it is not feeding the entire load to that dwelling.

Below you will find a dwelling service table from the 2014 Florida Building Code 5th Edition that was taken out in the 6th Edition of the FBC, but it still works and it includes  both copper and aluminum conductors plus the size of the required grounding electrode conductor.  Use it in good faith that it will give you the right size service and/or feeder to your dwelling unit. .

image

image

Till next time be safe work safe

Jake

Continue Reading310.15(B)(7) 120/240-Volt, Single-Phase Dwelling Services and Feeders.

Picture of the week 1/13/2019

  • Post author:
  • Post category:News
  • Post comments:0 Comments

This week picture comes from Howard Borna, he found this in Jupiter.  Thanks Howard always good to hear from you.

thumbnail_IMG_2450

It came with a side order of working clearance violations.

thumbnail_IMG_2451

This is a good example of why we need permits even to replace pool equipment.

Till next time be safe work safe and do it right!

Jake

Continue ReadingPicture of the week 1/13/2019

MC Cable and ANTI-SHORTS

  • Post author:
  • Post category:News
  • Post comments:0 Comments

Got a call this week from a contractor who was told by his inspector that he needed ANTI-SHORTS on all his MC cables.  If you are using MC cable per 330.40 of the Code you are not required to have ANTI-SHORTS installed, they are only required when you use AC cable. Looking at sections 330.40 and 320.40 these section are easy to read and understand when anti-shorts are required.  See my graphic below to help understand when they are required and when they are not.  In the field today we mostly use MC cable I personally have not seen AC cable used in a long time we just got use to calling MC, “AC cable or BX”.  This contractor had to spend a day and a half inserting something that was not required.  When you buy the reels on MC most come with anti-shorts because some places have required them because they wanted them, not because the Code required them. See the link below to NEMA’s bulletin for the use of ANTI-SHORTS.

MC cable has a plastic strip inside of it NO PAPER OR CARDBOARD

AC cable has paper and or cardboard fillers surrounding the conductors.

https://www.nema.org/Technical/Documents/Use%20of%20Anti-Short%20Bushings%20for%20Terminating%20Type%20MC%20Cable.pdf

image

As always if you are having trouble seeing the graphic just click on it.

Till the next time be safe work safe.

Jake

Continue ReadingMC Cable and ANTI-SHORTS

Do I need and outlet at my service?

Question came up this week in reference to having a service outlet near the service equipment.  I referred them to section 210.64 and told them one was required, except at a one-family and two-family dwelling. This would be for service equipment installed both inside or outside of a building.   If you install a 480 volt service make sure to put in a small step down transformer in order to comply with this section………..

image

Till next time be safe work safe

Jake

Continue ReadingDo I need and outlet at my service?

Smoke Alarm follow up

  • Post author:
  • Post category:News
  • Post comments:0 Comments

This is a follow up to the smoke alarm posting from last week.  Smoke alarms do have a requirement for being 4” down from the ceiling, but only when two kinds of ceilings are encountered.  Sloped and peaked ceilings have a 4” requirement to the top of the smoke alarm.  See the picture below.  But on a flat ceiling the top of the detector can be mount right up against the ceiling.

image

Till next time be safe work safe

Jake

Continue ReadingSmoke Alarm follow up

Location of residential smoke alarm

  • Post author:
  • Post category:News
  • Post comments:0 Comments

This is just a reminder from a recent post as to where a smoke alarm can be placed on a wall or ceiling.

We still have inspectors out there that require the alarm to be 4” down from the ceiling and the bottom not more than 12” down from the ceiling, which changed several years ago (2007 NFPA 72).  Don’t be afraid to show the inspector this section.  We can all learn new code changes from one another on a daily basis.

Per NFPA 72 17.7.3.2.1 the smoke alarm when installed on a side wall ca be placed right up next to the ceiling and be down as much as 12” to the top of the detector from the ceiling.  Most of the complaints from contractors are because the inspectors are failing them on the final and want it moved.  See the picture below, this comes right out of NFPA 72 which regulates the placement of smoke alarms in residential dwelling units.

The 4” down is an old section for smoke alarms from NFPA 72, but still exists for the installation of heat detectors.

image

Till next time be safe work safe

Jake

Continue ReadingLocation of residential smoke alarm